Just because you like the game, does not give you the right to push down and silence those who don't, especially those who attempt to broach the subject with intelligence and constructive criticism. Those of us that aren't happy should be freely able to express our opinions and reasons, in a well informed and written manner, without being attacked personally and argued against without taking into account that our viewpoints are just as valid. But those of us that aren't happy shouldn't have to cater to those that are by not expressing our discontent. If you're happy with what you have, fine, that's perfectly within your rights. Because nobody wants to actively protest against it, even after they've given their money and loyalty to the product. These are serious issues that are being brushed aside as unimportant, which is why several EA developers, not to point a finger at Chucklefish alone, are able to scrape by with poor development practices and time tables. People being unwilling to debate about these topics. :DĪnd that in and of itself is a part of the problem. Like i said Moving on to different game will save you the stress and pain of playing this game. I put money on it i see alot of problems but i am not the dev of the game so i could care less. Think about this no one forced you to put money in early acces game :/. That and answering OPs question, with why it is in a small way when eeking out the one solid point it had. I also suggested means to correct it, another of which could be hiring a new project lead for example or shaking up their current habits and bring them more in line with other developments. Once of which is lack of meaningful development over a long period of time compared to other similer projects. I am, but that doesn't make it not an early access game with problems. Originally posted by Christan:*polite snip due to length* In short your argument can be broken down to this is an early access game go play something else.
0 kommentar(er)
